# Difference between revisions of "Modelling and scientific computing"

Jump to navigation
Jump to search

m |
m |
||

Line 3: | Line 3: | ||

Please [[Media:A-Modelling-20-Sept-2010.pdf|download the lecture slides]]. 13 September 2010 (slides 1 to 8)<br>15 September 2010 (slides 9 to 15)<br>16 September 2010 (slides 16 to 19)<br>20 September 2010 (slides 20 to the end) | Please [[Media:A-Modelling-20-Sept-2010.pdf|download the lecture slides]]. 13 September 2010 (slides 1 to 8)<br>15 September 2010 (slides 9 to 15)<br>16 September 2010 (slides 16 to 19)<br>20 September 2010 (slides 20 to the end) | ||

== Approximation and computer representation == | == Approximation and computer representation == |

## Revision as of 21:26, 14 January 2019

## Process modelling slides

Please download the lecture slides. 13 September 2010 (slides 1 to 8)

15 September 2010 (slides 9 to 15)

16 September 2010 (slides 16 to 19)

20 September 2010 (slides 20 to the end)

## Approximation and computer representation

Please download the lecture slides. 22 and 23 September (updated)

- More about the Ariane 5 rocket 16-bit overflow
- Python code used in class for ...

calculating relative error | working with integers |
---|---|

```
import numpy as np
y = 13.0
n = 3 # number of significant figures
rel_error = 0.5 * 10 ** (2-n) # relative error calculation
x = y / 2.0
x_prev = 0.0
iter = 0
while abs(x - x_prev)/x > rel_error:
x_prev = x
x = (x + y/x) / 2.0
print(abs(x - x_prev)/x)
iter += 1
print('Used %d iterations to calculate sqrt(%f) = %.20f; '
'true value = %.20f\n ' % (iter, y, x, np.sqrt(y)))
``` |
```
import numpy as np
print(np.int16(32767))
print(np.int16(32767+1))
print(np.int16(32767+2))
# Smallest and largest 16-bit integer
print(np.iinfo(np.int16).min, np.iinfo(np.int16).max)
# Smallest and largest 32-bit integer
print(np.iinfo(np.int32).min, np.iinfo(np.int32).max)
``` |

working with floats | special numbers |

```
import numpy as np
help(np.finfo) # Read what the np.finfo function does
f = np.float32 # single precision, 32-bit float, 4 bytes
f = np.float64 # double precision, 64-bit float, 8 bytes
print('machine precision = eps = %.10g' % np.finfo(f).eps)
print('number of exponent bits = %.10g' % np.finfo(f).iexp)
print('number of significand bits = %.10g' % np.finfo(f).nmant)
print('smallest floating point value = %.10g' % np.finfo(f).min)
print('largest floating point value = %.10g' % np.finfo(f).max)
# Approximate number of decimal digits to which this kind
# of float is precise.
print('decimal precision = %.10g' % np.finfo(f).precision)
``` |
```
import numpy as np
# Infinities
print(np.inf, -np.inf)
print(np.float(1E400)) # inf, number exceeds maximum value that
# is possible with a 64-bit float: overflow
print(np.inf * -4.0) # -inf
print(np.divide(2.4, 0.0)) # inf
# NaN's
a = np.float(-2.3)
print(np.sqrt(a)) # nan
print(np.log(a)) # nan
# Negative zeros
a = np.float(0.0)
b = np.float(-4.0)
c = a/b
print(c) # -0.0
print(c * c) # 0.0
eps = np.finfo(np.float).eps
e = eps/3.0 # create a number smaller than machine precision
# Question: why can we create a number smaller than eps?
print(e)
# Interesting property: non-commutative operations can occur
# when working with values smaller than eps. Why?
# The print out here should "True", but it prints "False"
print((1.0 + (e + e)) == (1.0 + e + e))
``` |

## Practice questions

- From the Hangos and Cameron reference, (available here] - accessible from McMaster computers only)
- Work through example 2.4.1 on page 33
- Exercise A 2.1 and A 2.2 on page 37
- Exercise A 2.4: which controlling mechanisms would you consider?

- Homework problem, similar to the case presented on slide 18, except
- Use two inlet streams \(\sf F_1\) and \(\sf F_2\), and assume they are volumetric flow rates
- An irreversible reaction occurs, \(\sf A + 3B \stackrel{r}{\rightarrow} 2C\)
- The reaction rate for A = \(\sf -r_A = -kC_\text{A} C_\text{B}^3\)

- Derive the time-varying component mass balance for species B.
- \( V\frac{dC_B}{dt} = F^{\rm in}_1 C^{\rm in}_{\sf B,1} + F^{\rm in}_2 C^{\rm in}_{\sf B,2} - F^{\rm out} C_{\sf B} + 0 - 3 kC_{\sf A} C_{\sf B}^3 V \)

- What is the steady state value of \(\sf C_B\)? Can it be calculated without knowing the steady state value of \(\sf C_A\)?
- \( F^{\rm in}_1 C^{\rm in}_{\sf B,1} + F^{\rm in}_2 C^{\rm in}_{\sf B,2} - F^{\rm out} \overline{C}_{\sf B} - 3 k \overline{C}_{\sf A} \overline{C}^3_{\sf B} V \) - we require the steady state value of \(C_{\sf A}\), denoted as \(\overline{C}_{\sf A}\), to calculate \(\overline{C}_{\sf B}\).