Difference between revisions of "Worksheets/Week3"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kevin Dunn (talk | contribs) (→Part 5) |
Kevin Dunn (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
source('https://yint.org/contourPlot.R') | source('https://yint.org/contourPlot.R') | ||
contourPlot(model.siderxn.cp) | contourPlot(model.siderxn.cp) | ||
</code> | </code> | ||
</div></html> | </div></html> |
Revision as of 19:07, 11 March 2019
Part 1
A factorial experiment was run to investigate the settings that minimize the production of an unwanted side product. The two factors being investigated are called A and B for simplicity.
# A = additive at 20mL and 30mL for low and high levels
A <- c(-1, +1, -1, +1)
# B = without (-) or with (+) baffles
B <- c(-1, -1, +1, +1)
# Response y is the amount of side product formed, y [grams]
y <- c(89, 268, 179, 448)
# Fit a linear model
model.siderxn <- lm(y ~ A + B + A*B)
summary(model.siderxn)
# Uncomment this line if you run the code in RStudio
#library(pid)
# Comment this line if you run this code in RStudio
source('https://yint.org/contourPlot.R')
# See how the two factors affect the response:
contourPlot(model.siderxn)
interaction.plot(A, B, y)
interaction.plot(B, A, y)
# Make a prediction with this model:
xA = -1
xB = -1
y.hat <- predict(model.siderxn, data.frame(A = xA, B = xB))
paste0('Predicted value is: ', y.hat, ' grams of side product.')
Part 2
Continuing from above, with 2 extra experimental points:
# A = additive at 20mL and 30mL for low and high levels
A <- c(-1, +1, -1, +1, 0, 0)
# B = without (-) or with (+) baffles
B <- c(-1, -1, +1, +1, -1, +1)
# Response y is the amount of side product formed, y [grams]
y <- c(89, 268, 179, 448, 186, 290)
model.siderxn.cp <- lm(y ~ A + B + A*B)
summary(model.siderxn.cp)
# Uncomment this line if you run the code in RStudio
#library(pid)
# Comment this line if you run this code in RStudio
source('https://yint.org/contourPlot.R')
contourPlot(model.siderxn.cp)