Difference between revisions of "Worksheets/Week6"

From Statistics for Engineering
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 70: Line 70:


Data from a bioreactor experiment is available, were we were investigating four factors:
Data from a bioreactor experiment is available, were we were investigating four factors:
* '''A''' = feed rate: 5 g/min or 8 g/min
* '''B''' = initial inoculate amount: 300 g or 400 g
* '''C''' = feed substrate concentration: 40 g/L or 60 g/L
* '''D''' = dissolved oxygen set-point: 4 mg/L or 5 mg/L


The 16 experiments from a full factorial, 24, were randomly run, and the yields, y, the outcome variable were given in standard order: <tt>[60, 59, 63, 61, 69, 61, 94, 93, 56, 63, 70, 65, 44, 45, 78, 77]</tt>
{| class="wikitable"
! Factor name
! Description
! Low value
! High value
! Type of factor
|-
| '''A'''
| Feed rate
| 5 g/min
| 8 g/min
| Numeric factor
|-
| '''B'''
| Initial inoculant amount
| 300 g
| 400 g
| Numeric
|-
| '''C'''
| Feed substrate concentration
| 40 g/L
| 60 g/L
| Numeric
|-
| '''D'''
| Dissolved oxygen set-point
| 4 mg/L
| 5 mg/L
| Numeric
|}
 
 
The 16 experiments from a full factorial, 2^4 = 16, were randomly run, and the yields, y, the outcome variable were given in standard order: <tt>[60, 59, 63, 61, 69, 61, 94, 93, 56, 63, 70, 65, 44, 45, 78, 77]</tt>


<html><div data-datacamp-exercise data-lang="r" data-height="auto">
<html><div data-datacamp-exercise data-lang="r" data-height="auto">

Revision as of 09:08, 17 October 2019

Part 1

Case study: Achieve a stability value of 50 days or more, for a new product. We had a full factorial set of experiments in 3 factors:

Factor name Description Low value High value Type of factor
A Enzyme strength 20% 30% Numeric factor
B Feed concentration 75% 85% Numeric
C Mixer type R W Categorical

We will show what we loose out if we pretend we only did half the experiments. In other words, we actually have 8 experiments, but we will see what happens if we only use 4 of them.


# This is the half-fraction, when C = A*B A = c(-1, +1, -1, +1) B = c(-1, -1, +1, +1) C = A * B # The response: stability [units=days] y = ... model_stability_poshalf model_stability_poshalf = lm(y ~ A*B*C) summary(model_stability_poshalf) # Uncomment this line if you run the code in RStudio #library(pid) # Comment these 2 lines if you run this code in RStudio source('https://yint.org/paretoPlot.R') source('https://yint.org/contourPlot.R') paretoPlot(model_stability_poshalf) # This is the other half-fraction, when C = -A*B A = c(-1, +1, -1, +1) B = c(-1, -1, +1, +1) C = -1 * A * B # The response: stability [units=days] y = ... model_stability_neghalf = lm(y ~ A*B*C) summary(model_stability_neghalf)

Part 2

Data from a bioreactor experiment is available, were we were investigating four factors:

Factor name Description Low value High value Type of factor
A Feed rate 5 g/min 8 g/min Numeric factor
B Initial inoculant amount 300 g 400 g Numeric
C Feed substrate concentration 40 g/L 60 g/L Numeric
D Dissolved oxygen set-point 4 mg/L 5 mg/L Numeric


The 16 experiments from a full factorial, 2^4 = 16, were randomly run, and the yields, y, the outcome variable were given in standard order: [60, 59, 63, 61, 69, 61, 94, 93, 56, 63, 70, 65, 44, 45, 78, 77]

base <- c(-1, +1) design <- expand.grid(A=base, B=base, C=base) A <- design$A B <- design$B C <- design$C D <- A * B * C # Confirm that you can find these 8 runs yourself: y <- c(60, 63, 70, 61, 44, 61, 94, 77) model.bio <- lm(y ~ A*B*C*D) summary(model.bio) # Uncomment this line if you run the code in RStudio #library(pid) # Comment these 2 lines if you run this code in RStudio source('https://yint.org/paretoPlot.R') source('https://yint.org/contourPlot.R') paretoPlot(model.bio)