Separation Processes: CHE 4M3
Administrative
|
Class materials
|
|
Announcements (previous ones)
- Please note for assignment 4, question 5, you will require making an important correction to the membrane notes: slide 76:
Some hints and an update for assignment 4, question 5:
- The and terms are not the area of the membrane: they are the permeances of the salt and solvent respectively. This unfortunate notation is widely used though in most texts.
- There is a correction, the feed concentration should be 2.5 g NaCl per liter in the feed (not 2.5 wt% NaCl). I apologize for wasting your time for those of you that have been iterating with negative concentrations.
- And another hint. I found a way to solve question 5 that leads to faster convergence:
- Specify and
- Guess instead
- Calculate from equation 5
- If your calculated value of is negative or exceeds , then repeat your guess for , until you get a that lies between 0 and and double check also that the rejection coefficient from this is reasonable, around 90 to 99%.
- This approach to estimate and then will get you really close to the final answer.
- Now carry on with the rest of the steps in the notes. It's interesting how simply flipping what you guess first leads to much faster convergence.
- If you iterative and get a negative value for or , it simply means that you must decrease your guess for that term, since you obviously can't have a negative concentration.
- And a final hint: this question is much better to solve on a computer, with goal seek, than by hand. There is tremendous sensitivity to initial guesses, so solving by hand will take too long.
- For question 2(B), part 3: by definition, optimization implies we have excess degrees of freedom, i.e. more unknowns than equations. You should get a system of 3 unknowns (including and ) and 2 equations. Set the 3rd unknown to various values (between its lower and upper bound), and solve for and . Pick the solution that gives the optimum.
|
|
|
|
Assignments, projects, exams
|
Course calendar
|
|
|